POWER CHALLENGES IN 2020 NUCLEAR ENERGY
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
seminar surveyer
Active In SP
**

Posts: 3,541
Joined: Sep 2010
#1
19-01-2011, 03:54 PM





.doc   POWER CHALLENGES IN 2020.doc (Size: 140 KB / Downloads: 64)

ABSTRACT:

Power—from the design perspective, less is more but too little is never enough. We live in a power-constrained world. Battery-powered systems may be the most talked about, but the power problem is everywhere—from kilowatt-rated industrial motors to mobile phones to sensor-activated devices that wake up once a week to send telemetry data. Energy consumption in the United States alone is forecast to increase by 32 percent by 2020. This appetite for power places a serious strain on natural resources, the grid, our wallets and business growth.
The march toward a more energy-efficient future will only make power efficiency more critical. Engineers have been wrestling with the power problem for more than a decade, resulting in some significant strides in power management chips, systems and software.
At the fabrication level, process engineers have pushed down supply voltages and shrunk transistor sizes. DSP, applications processor and MCU designers are becoming particularly inventive with everything from a growing number of power-saving modes, to clock gating, to low-power cell libraries that complement low-power processes. System designers and software engineers have also developed a long list of options.
As product features grow and consumer expectations rise, the imperative to do more with less never changes. Semiconductor technology is playing a key role in energy conservation by combining efficiency and intelligence. Building efficiency into the chips and system designs that go into products we use daily helps take some of the responsibility from the consumer. So how do we get to the next level? One way for the industry to plot a course is to examine trends and see where they lead. Integrating the techniques and technologies will probably supply at least part of the answer. It may well be—as with many things in life—the whole is greater (or in this case, less) than the sum of the parts.
Power challenges may accure in many process but in this time to see the topic is “atomic energy “

INTRODUCTION :

The sun and stars are seemingly inexhaustible sources of energy. That energy is the result of nuclear reactions, in which matter is converted to energy. We have been able to harness that mechanism and regularly use it to generate power. Presently, nuclear energy provides for approximately 16% of the world's electricity. Unlike the stars, the nuclear reactors that we have today work on the principle of nuclear fission. Scientists are working like madmen to make fusion reactors which have the potential of providing more energy with fewer disadvantages than fission reactors.
The study the future of nuclear power because of a belief that this technology is an important option for the world to meet future energy needs without emitting carbon dioxide and other atmospheric pollutants. Other options include increased efficiency, renewables, and carbon sequestration, and all may be needed for a successful greenhouse gas management strategy. This study, addressed to government, industry, and academic leaders, discusses the interrelated technical, economic, environmental, and political challenges facing a significant increase in global nuclear power utilization over the next half century and what might be done to overcome those challenges

MILESTONES IN THE HISTORY OF NUCLEAR ENERGY:

 December 2, 1942: The Nuclear Age began at the University of Chicago when Enrico Fermi made a chain reaction in a pile of uranium.
 August 6, 1945: The United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan, killing over 100,000.


. August 9, 1945: The United States dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki, Japan, killing over 40,000.
 November 1, 1952: The first large version of the hydrogen bomb (thousands of times more powerful than the atomic bomb) was exploded by the United States for testing purposes.
 February 21, 1956: The first major nuclear power plant opened in England.

PRODUCTION:
Changes can occur in the structure of the nuclei of atoms. These changes are called nuclear reactions. Energy created in a nuclear reaction is called nuclear energy, or atomic energy.
Nuclear energy is produced naturally and in man-made operations under human control.
 Naturally: Some nuclear energy is produced naturally. For example, the Sun and other stars make heat and light by nuclear reactions.
 Man-Made: Nuclear energy can be man-made too. Machines called nuclear reactors, parts of nuclear power plants, provide electricity for many cities. Man-made nuclear reactions also occur in the explosion of atomic and hydrogen bombs.

Nuclear Fission:
The graph of binding energy per nucleon suggests that nuclides with a mass larger than about 130 amu should spontaneously split apart to form lighter, more stable, nuclides. Experimentally, we find that spontaneous fission reactions occur for only the very heaviest nuclides those with mass numbers of 230 or more. Even when they do occur, these reactions are often very slow. The half-life for the spontaneous fission of 238U, for example, is 1016 years, or about two million times longer than the age of our planet!
We don't have to wait, however, for slow spontaneous fission reactions to occur. By irradiating samples of heavy nuclides with slow-moving thermal neutrons it is possible to induce fission reactions. When 235U absorbs a thermal neutron, for example, it splits into two particles of uneven mass and releases an average of 2.5 neutrons

The absorption of a neutron by 238U induces oscillations in the nucleus that deform it until it splits into fragments the way a drop of liquid might break into smaller droplets
More than 370 daughter nuclides with atomic masses between 72 and 161 amu are formed in the thermal-neutron-induced fission of 235U, including the two products shown below.

Several isotopes of uranium undergo induced fission. But the only naturally occurring isotope in which we can induce fission with thermal neutrons is 235U, which is present at an abundance of only 0.72%. The induced fission of this isotope releases an average of 200 MeV per atom, or 80 million kilojoules per gram of 235U. The attraction of nuclear fission as a source of power can be understood by comparing this value with the 50 kJ/g released when natural gas is burned.
The first artificial nuclear reactor was built by Enrico Fermi and co-workers beneath the University of Chicago's football stadium and brought on line on December 2, 1942. This reactor, which produced several kilowatts of power, consisted of a pile of graphite blocks weighing 385 tons stacked in layers around a cubical array of 40 tons of uranium metal and uranium oxide. Spontaneous fission of 238U or 235U in this reactor produced a very small number of neutrons. But enough uranium was present so that one of these neutrons induced the fission of a 235U nucleus, thereby releasing an average of 2.5 neutrons, which catalyzed the fission of additional 235U nuclei in a chain reaction, as shown in the figure below. The amount of fissionable material necessary for the chain reaction to sustain itself is called the critical mass.

The Fermi reactor at Chicago served as a prototype for larger reactors constructed in 1943 at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Hanford, Washington, to produce 239Pu for one of the atomic bombs dropped on Japan at the end of World War II. As we have seen, some of the neutrons released in the chain reaction are absorbed by 238U to form 239U, which undergoes decay by the successive loss of two �/i>--particles to form 239Pu. 238U is an example of a fertile nuclide. It doesn't undergo fission with thermal neutrons, but it can be converted to 239Pu, which does undergo thermal-neutron-induced fission.
Fission reactors can be designed to handle naturally abundant 235U, as well as fuels described as slightly enriched (2-5% 235U), highly enriched (20-30% 235U), or fully enriched (>90% 235U). Heat generated in the reactor core is transferred to a cooling agent in a closed system. The cooling agent is then passed through a series of heat exchangers in which water is heated to steam. The steam produced in these exchangers then drives a turbine that generates electrical power. There are two ways of specifying the power of such a plant: the thermal energy produced by the reactor or the electrical energy generated by the turbines. The electrical capacity of the plant is usually about one-third of the thermal power.
It takes 1011 fissions per second to produce one watt of electrical power. As a result, about one gram of fuel is consumed per day per megawatt of electrical energy produced. This means that one gram of waste products is produced per megawatt per day, which includes 0.5 grams of 239Pu. These waste products must be either reprocessed to generate more fuel or stored for the tens of thousands of years it takes for the level of radiation to reach a safe limit.
If we could design a reactor in which the ratio of the 239Pu or 233U produced to the 235U consumed was greater than 1, the reactor would generate more fuel than it consumed. Such reactors are known as breeders, and commercial breeder reactors are now operating in France.
The key to an efficient breeder reactor is a fuel that gives the largest possible number of neutrons released per neutron absorbed. The breeder reactors being built today use a mixture of PuO2 and UO2 as the fuel and fast neutrons to activate fission. Fast neutrons carry an energy of at least several KeV and therefore travel 10,000 or more times faster than thermal neutrons. 239Pu in the fuel assembly absorbs one of these fast neutrons and undergoes fission with the release of three neutrons. 238U in the fuel then captures one of these neutrons to produce additional 239Pu.
The advantage of breeder reactors is obvious they mean a limitless supply of fuel for nuclear reactors. There are significant disadvantages, however. Breeder reactors are more expensive to build. They are also useless without a subsidiary industry to collect the fuel, process it, and ship the 239Pu to new reactors.
It is the reprocessing of 239Pu that concerns most of the critics of breeder reactors. 239Pu is so dangerous as a carcinogen that the nuclear industry places a limit on exposure to this material that assumes workers inhale no more than 0.2 micrograms of plutonium over their lifetimes. There is also concern that the 239Pu produced by these reactors might be stolen and assembled into bombs by terrorist organizations.
The fate of breeder reactors in the United States is linked to economic considerations. Because of the costs of building these reactors and safely reprocessing the 239Pu produced, the breeder reactor becomes economical only when the scarcity of uranium drives its price so high that the breeder reactor becomes cost effective by comparison. If nuclear energy is to play a dominant role in the generation of electrical energy in the 21st century, breeder reactors eventually may be essential.
Although the "pile" Fermi constructed at the University of Chicago in 1942 was the first artificial nuclear reactor, it was not the first fission reactor to exist on Earth. In 1972, a group of French scientists discovered that uranium ore from a deposit in the Oklo mine in Gabon, West Africa, contained 0.4% 235U instead of the 0.72% abundance found in all other sources of this ore. Analysis of the trace elements in the ore suggested that the amount of 235U in this ore was unusually small because natural fission reactors operated in this deposit for a period of 600,000 to 800,000 years about 2 billion years ago.

Fission
Advantages:
1. fuel lasts for years
2. no byproducts (the only thing it produces is spent fuel, evaporated water from cooling towers and electricity)
3. provides more power per plant than any other option around today, except perhaps hydroelectricity
Disadvantages:
1. possibility of reactor or plant failure and the consequences of that failure
2. security issues (fissile material can be used for extremely dangerous weapons and costs to lock up both fuel and waste are prohibitively high)
3. fuel and waste are extremely toxic, especially waste, and once fuel has been completely spent, waste must be safeguarded from both hostile acts and leaching into the environment

Nuclear Fusion :
The graph of binding energy per nucleon suggests another way of obtaining useful energy from nuclear reactions. Fusing two light nuclei can liberate as much energy as the fission of 235U or 239Pu. The fusion of four protons to form a helium nucleus, two positrons (and two neutrinos), for example, generates 24.7 MeV of energy.

Most of the energy radiated from the surface of the sun is produced by the fusion of protons to form helium atoms within its core.
Fusion reactions have been duplicated in man-made devices. The enormous destructive power of the 235U-fueled atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, which killed 75,000 people, and the 239Pu-fueled bomb dropped on Nagasaki three days later touched off a violent debate after World War II about the building of the next superweapon a fusion, or "hydrogen," bomb. Alumni of the Manhattan project and implimentation, who had developed the atomic bomb, were divided on the issue. Ernest Lawrence and Edward Teller fought for the construction of the fusion device. J. Robert Oppenheimer and Enrico Fermi argued against it. The decision was made to develop the weapon, and the first artificial fusion reaction occurred when the hydrogen bomb was tested in November 1952.
The history of fusion research is therefore the opposite of fission research. With fission, the reactor came first, and then the bomb was built. With fusion, the bomb was built long before any progress was made toward the construction of a controlled fusion reactor. More than 40 years after the first hydrogen bomb was exploded, the feasibility of controlled fusion reactions is still open to debate. The reaction that is most likely to fuel the first fusion reactor is the thermonuclear d-t, or deuterium-tritium, reaction. This reaction fuses two isotopes of hydrogen, deuterium (2H) and tritium (3H), to form helium and a neutron.

If we consider the implications of this reaction we can begin to understand why it is called a thermonuclear reaction and why it is so difficult to produce in a controlled manner. The d-t reaction requires that we fuse two positively charged particles. This means that we must provide enough energy to overcome the force of repulsion between these particles before fusion can occur. To produce a self-sustaining reaction, we have to provide the particles with enough thermal energy so that they can fuse when they collide.
Each fusion reaction is characterized by a specific ignition temperature, which must be surpassed before the reaction can occur. The d-t reaction has an ignition temperature above 108 K. In a hydrogen bomb, a fission reaction produced by a small atomic bomb is used to heat the contents to the temperature required to initiate fusion. Obtaining the same result in a controlled reaction is much more challenging.
Any substance at temperatures approaching 108 K will exist as a completely ionized gas, or plasma. The goals of fusion research at present include the following.
• To achieve the required temperature to ignite the fusion reaction.
• To keep the plasma together at this temperature long enough to get useful amounts of energy out of the thermonuclear fusion reactions.
• To obtain more energy from the thermonuclear reactions than is used to heat the plasma to the ignition temperature.
These are not trivial goals. The only reasonable container for a plasma at 108 K is a magnetic field. Both doughnut-shaped (toroidal) and linear magnetic bottles have been proposed as fusion reactors. But reactors that produce high enough temperatures for ignition are not the same as the reactors that have produced long enough confinement times for the plasma to provide useful amounts of energy.
A second approach to a controlled fusion reactor involves hitting fuel pellets containing the proper reagents for the thermonuclear reaction with pulsed beams of laser power. If enough power was delivered, the fuel pellets would collapse upon themselves, or implode, to reach densities several orders of magnitude greater than normal. This could produce a plasma both hot enough and dense enough to initiate fusion reactions.
FUSION:
Advantages:
The fuel for fusion reactions are readily available. Deuterium and Tritium are virtually inexhaustible.
Unlike the burning of coal or other fossil fuels, fusion does not emit harmful toxins into the atmosphere. The combustion of most fossil fuels involves some form of the reaction
C + O2(g) --> CO2(g) + heat
The carbon dioxide (CO2(g)) emitted by this reaction contributes to the global warning/so-called "Greenhouse Effect" that we've all heard so much about. Fusion, however, produces only helium, a gas that is already in abundance in the atmosphere and will not contribute to global warming.
A major concern with the use of fission power is the issue of nuclear waste, a dangerous material that can both directly injure people and be manufactured into weapons. Fusion has no such problems with dangerous by-products.
Disadvantages
• Scientists have not yet been able to contain a fusion reaction long enough for there to be a net energy gain.
• Many countries are phasing out fusion research because of the failure to reach a breakthrough
NUCLEAR ENERGY:
Advantages:
 The Earth has limited supplies of coal and oil. Nuclear power plants could still produce electricity after coal and oil become scarce.
 Nuclear power plants need less fuel than ones which burn fossil fuels. One ton of uranium produces more energy than is produced by several million tons of coal or several million barrels of oil.
 Coal and oil burning plants pollute the air. Well-operated nuclear power plants do not release contaminants into the environment.
Disadvantages :
i) Nuclear explosions produce radiation. The nuclear radiation harms the cells of the body which can make people sick or even kill them. Illness can strike people years after their exposure to nuclear radiation.
ii) One possible type of reactor disaster is known as a meltdown. In such an accident, the fission reaction goes out of control, leading to a nuclear explosion and the emission of great amounts of radiation.
(1) no In 1979, the cooling system failed at the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Radiation leaked, forcing tens of thousands of people to flee. The problem was solved minutes before a total meltdown would have occurred. Fortunately, there were deaths.
iii) In 1986, a much worse disaster struck Russia's Chernobyl nuclear power plant. In this incident, a large amount of radiation escaped from the reactor. Hundreds of thousands of people were exposed to the radiation. Several dozen died within a few days. In the years to come, thousands more may die of cancers induced by the radiation.
iv) Nuclear reactors also have waste disposal problems. Reactors produce nuclear waste products which emit dangerous radiation. Because they could kill people who touch them, they cannot be thrown away like ordinary garbage. Currently, many nuclear wastes are stored in special cooling pools at the nuclear reactors.
v) Nuclear reactors only last for about forty to fifty years.
CONCLUSION:
While One can see that there are many different types of fuels available. Although there is no ideal fuel, some fuels are certainly more efficient than others. Unfortunately, as I mentioned before, the use of certain nuclear fuels is constrained by the reactors that we currently have. There may be more efficient ways to make nuclear fuel, but then new reactors would have to be designed, which is no easy task. Compatibility with current nuclear reactors is certainly an advantage for any new nuclear fuel.
Although many people fear using nuclear fuel for power, it is actually relatively safe. It is a shame that two accidents (Chernobyl and Three Mile Island) tarnished the repuation of nuclear energy forever. In addition, reprocessing is not popular currently, but I hope to see plutonium-thorium fuel become more widespread in the future despite the high costs of reprocessing. It is better to use up the plutonium it is still useful, extending the lifetime of uranium supplies
Reply

Important Note..!

If you are not satisfied with above reply ,..Please

ASK HERE

So that we will collect data for you and will made reply to the request....OR try below "QUICK REPLY" box to add a reply to this page

Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.


Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Burgeoning Trends in Banking & Insurance - Challenges and Opportunities seminar projects maker 0 244 27-09-2013, 03:07 PM
Last Post: seminar projects maker
  Telecom Sector in India: Vision 2020 Report study tips 0 208 10-09-2013, 03:50 PM
Last Post: study tips
  Demographic challenges PPT study tips 0 193 20-08-2013, 03:18 PM
Last Post: study tips
  ONLINE BANKING – Challenges and Opportunities Report study tips 0 320 02-08-2013, 02:50 PM
Last Post: study tips
  Ethical challenges in the changing business environment study tips 0 264 04-07-2013, 03:15 PM
Last Post: study tips
  WIND ENERGY - THE FACTS COSTS & PRICES study tips 0 280 15-06-2013, 02:59 PM
Last Post: study tips
  Exchange Traded Funds - Its Growth & Challenges in India study tips 0 374 05-03-2013, 12:24 PM
Last Post: study tips
  New competitive strategies: Challenges to organizations and information technology study tips 0 340 04-03-2013, 11:05 AM
Last Post: study tips
  CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS OF PRIVATE SERVICE SECTORS ORGANIZATIONS IN INDIA REPORT project girl 0 292 05-02-2013, 03:44 PM
Last Post: project girl
  Imagining India 2020 PPT project girl 0 616 16-01-2013, 12:09 PM
Last Post: project girl